Press Release
November 13, 2025
Pres. Trump’s Pollster: Three Quarters of Trump Voters Support International Assistance; New Organization Launches Initial Six-Figure Ad Spend to Mobilize Republicans and Independents to Support International Assistance and Protect American Interests
Campaign For America First International Assistance (CAFIA) to Initially Focus on Three RCCC Patriot Members Who Can Deliver Results for America Abroad
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, The Campaign for America First International Assistance (CAFIA), a 501(c)(4), announced the launch of three new ads in the districts of Reps. Juan Ciscomani, Gabe Evans, and Ryan Mackenzie, paired with the public release of new polling of voters across the country. This six-figure campaign focuses on how targeted, accountable, America First international assistance advances American security, protects taxpayers, and opens markets for U.S. workers—an approach rooted in American strength and leadership.
The spots released will be run on connected television in Arizona’s 6th District, Colorado’s 8th District, and Pennsylvania’s 7th District, to bolster their efforts to root out fraud, tamp down terrorism, secure our borders, support our small farmers, and feed starving children with their support of America First international assistance.
As part of CAFIA’s launch, the organization commissioned a survey of 1,200 likely voters, which found that when international assistance is focused on American priorities, voters respond positively and say they prefer leaders who champion this practical approach.
Said John McLaughlin, "The majority of voters support international assistance that saves lives, improves global health, strengthens alliances, and bolsters national security and the economy."
POLL HIGHLIGHTS
A strong majority of Trump voters (72%) and Republicans (73%) support international assistance
77% of evangelicals support international assistance.
Independents who will play a critical role in deciding who wins the midterm elections are highly supportive (72%) of international assistance
Three-quarters of Trump voters (76%) and Republicans (76%) agree that “this kind of strategic investment in American leadership is consistent with President Trump’s America First vision.”
A majority of Americans (52%) believe that the cuts to international assistance earlier this year had a negative effect on America maintaining its position as a global superpower, with only 28% viewing such cuts positively.
Less than half of Trump voters (47%) and Republicans (46%) believe cuts to international assistance have a positive impact.
Reasons for Supporting International Assistance: national security by creating allies to counter dangerous influence from foreign adversaries like China, Russia, and Iran (35%); economic benefits for U.S. like increased jobs for American farmers and small businesses (23%); moral or religious obligation to help the most vulnerable (19%); and global leadership highlighting America’s strategic role in the world (16%). The priorities are similar among Trump voters, Republicans, Democrats, and Independents
Voters support moving international assistance oversight to the State Dept following the dismantling of USAID by a 47%-40% margin.
When asked, “What percent of the federal budget do you believe is spent on international assistance programs?” only 9.5% of likely voters correctly answered “less than 1%.” The average guess is 12.3% of the federal budget—more than ten times the actual level. Most voters, including Republicans and Trump voters, significantly overestimate what the U.S. spends.
A majority of Republicans agree President Trump would deserve the Nobel Prize for solving child starvation abroad.
Recent reporting underscores the stakes when life-saving programs lapse: humanitarian gaps can fuel instability, empower bad actors, and create conditions that ultimately cost Americans more. Lack of targeted, America First international assistance gives rise to terrorism, illegal immigration, and has adverse effects on small, American farms. In places like Myanmar and along the Thai border, aid shortfalls have coincided with dramatic increases in need and in crime, with desperate people often resorting to violence to feed their families.
About CAFIA
The Campaign for America First International Assistance (CAFIA) advances a practical, accountable approach to U.S. assistance that strengthens American security, supports American jobs, and upholds America’s leadership—always with strict oversight and measurable results.
Poll Methodology
This survey was conducted among 1,200 likely voters between October 26-29, 2025. All interviews were conducted online. The interview distribution and demographics reflect a 2026 general election turnout model. The accuracy of the sample of 1,200 likely voters is within +/- 2.8% at a 95% confidence interval. The numbers in this memorandum have been rounded and may not equal 100%.